News World US Derek Chauvin ‘never took knee off Floyd’s neck’ during arrest
Updated:

Derek Chauvin ‘never took knee off Floyd’s neck’ during arrest

Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Officer Derek Chauvin had his knee on George Floyd’s neck area – and was bearing down with most of his weight – the entire 9-1/2 minutes the Black man lay face-down with his hands cuffed behind his back, a use-of-force expert has testified at Mr Chauvin’s murder trial.

Jody Stiger, a Los Angeles Police Department sergeant serving as a prosecution witness, said that based on his review of video evidence, Mr Chauvin applied pressure to Floyd’s neck or neck area from the time officers began pinning Floyd to the ground until paramedics began to move him to a stretcher.

“That particular force did not change during the entire restraint period?” prosecutor Steve Schleicher asked on Wednesday (local time) as he showed the jury a composite of five still images.

“Correct,” replied Mr Stiger, who on Tuesday testified that the force used against Mr Floyd was excessive.

Chauvin lawyer Eric Nelson countered by pointing out what he said were moments in the video footage when Chauvin’s knee did not appear to be on Mr Floyd’s neck but on his shoulder blade area or the base of his neck.

Mr Stiger did not give much ground, saying the officer’s knee in some of the contested images still seemed to be near Mr Floyd’s neck, though he agreed his weight might have shifted at times.

In other testimony, the lead Minnesota state investigator on the case, James Reyerson, initially agreed with Mr Nelson that Mr Floyd seemed to say in a police body-camera video of his arrest, “I ate too many drugs.”

But when a prosecutor played a longer clip of the video, Reyerson said he believed what Mr Floyd really said was, “I ain’t do no drugs.”

Mr Chauvin, 45, is charged with murder and manslaughter in Mr Floyd’s death May 25. Mr Floyd, 46, was arrested outside a neighbourhood market after being accused of trying to pass a counterfeit $US20 note. A panicky-sounding Floyd struggled and claimed to be claustrophobic as police tried to put him in a squad car, and they pinned him to the pavement.

Bystander video of Mr Floyd crying that he could not breathe as onlookers yelled at Mr Chauvin to get off him sparked protests and scattered violence around the US.

Nelson has argued the now-fired white officer “did exactly what he had been trained to do over his 19-year career” and he has suggested Floyd’s drug use and his underlying health conditions are what killed him, not Chauvin’s knee, as prosecutors contend.

Fentanyl and methamphetamine were found in Floyd’s system.

Breahna Giles, a state forensic scientist, testified on Wednesday that pills found in the SUV Floyd was driving contained methamphetamine and fentanyl.

Another witness, forensic chemist Susan Meith, testified that remnants of a pill found in the back of the police squad car also contained methamphetamine and fentanyl.

Earlier, Mr Nelson asked Mr Stiger about uses of force that are commonly referred to by police as “lawful but awful”.

Mr Stiger conceded that “you can have a situation where by law it looks horrible to the common eye but based on the state law, it’s lawful”.

Mr Nelson has argued, too, that the officers on the scene were distracted by what they perceived as an increasingly hostile crowd of onlookers.

But Mr Stiger told the jury, “I did not perceive them as being a threat”, even though some bystanders were name-calling and using foul language. He added that most of the yelling was due to “their concern for Mr Floyd”.

Mr Chauvin’s lawyer noted that dispatchers had described Floyd as between 182cm and 198cm and possibly under the influence. Stiger agreed it was reasonable for Chauvin to come to the scene with a heightened sense of awareness.

Stiger further agreed with Nelson that an officer’s actions must be judged from the point of view of a reasonable officer on the scene, not in hindsight.

-AAP