News World Donald Trump’s standing gets another spanking
Updated:

Donald Trump’s standing gets another spanking

Stormy Daniels on 60 Minutes
Stormy Daniels during an interview with Anderson Cooper for 60 Minutes. Photo: CBS News
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Remember that crack by US President Donald Trump about shooting someone on Fifth Avenue and not losing a vote? He should have remembered that when it came to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Had he done so, we wouldn’t have had to cope with the now-indelible image – described by Ms Daniels on CBS News’ 60 Minutes – of her spanking Mr Trump in his underwear in a Las Vegas hotel room with a rolled-up magazine bearing his image. Thanks for nothing, Stormy.

In case there was ever any doubt, Ms Daniels’ appearance – utterly believable and without guile – made it clear that Mr Trump, via his lawyer Michael Cohen, paid off the porn star to keep their affair secret in the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign.

That was in the midst of the campaign’s crisis involving more than a dozen accusations of sexual harassment, as well as the infamous “Access Hollywood” audio tape.

Donald Trump
Stormy Daniels sued Donald Trump earlier this month, stating he never signed an agreement for her to keep quiet about an “intimate” relationship between them. Photo: AP

In authorising the hush money to Ms Daniels, Mr Trump suddenly succumbed to the old rules of propriety and political survival. Despite his swagger, he came to believe that hooking up with a porn star while his wife was home with a new baby in 2006 would vaporise his candidacy.

The irony, of course, is that Mr Trump’s crisis blew over. His campaign, and now his presidency – with its daily discharge of industrial-strength sleaze and dishonesty – effectively obliterated those rules, at least for now.

Thus numbed to Mr Trump’s outrages, you can imagine millions of Americans muttering on Sunday night, while waiting for Ms Daniels to spill the beans: “Tell me again why I should care about this. Is this about sex, or something more complicated?”

Ms Daniels was up to the task. She admitted to sleeping with Trump reluctantly but voluntarily. She admitted taking the $US130,000 and agreeing to keep quiet, and said she only tried to back out after The Wall Street Journal revealed the hush money deal.

She pointed out she wasn’t getting a penny for the 60 Minutes interview, and that interviewer Anderson Cooper hadn’t even bought her breakfast.

Ms Daniels had a tough job. No matter how many lie detectors she may pass, she had to break free of a stereotype: She’s a porn star, presumably will sleep with anyone, and now wants to cash in on a tryst she had more than a decade ago.

Moreover, she signed more than one denial of the affair, so why believe her now? And who was the man who she said threatened her to keep quiet back in 2011, and why didn’t she go to the police?

Mr Cooper threw it all at her, but Ms Daniels didn’t flinch. She appeared as a woman who made mistakes, told lies, and knows how it looks. But it was in the slow accumulation of her bad decisions that Ms Daniels seemed the most human.

Ms Daniels’ 60 Minutes appearance was, in the end, less about the sex and the betrayal and more about the thuggishness and bullying of Mr Trump’s henchmen, which has already been aired in the past few weeks.

By going on televsion, she managed to put a face and a personality to the stereotype of porn star.

Mr Trump faces real problems regarding the payment to Ms Daniels, under the arcane rules of US campaign finance laws, and perhaps even the investigation by special prosecutor Robert Mueller. He may put the squeeze on Mr Trump’s lawyer in hopes of finding out more.

But in the end, it may just be another shovelful of Trump sleaze to contend with.

One final thought: This weekend, the first of spring, began with the sight of young people around the US in service of a noble cause. It ended with a porn star describing a squalid tryst with the US President, and his alleged attempts to bully her into silence.

What’s next?

Comments
View Comments