News World Assange slams ’embarrassing’ US intelligence findings
Updated:

Assange slams ’embarrassing’ US intelligence findings

Julian Assange
Only an outstanding British arrest warrant for failing to appear in court is stopping Julian Assange leaving the sanctuary of the Ecuadorian embassy. Photo: PA
Share
Tweet Share Reddit Pin Email Comment

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has denounced last week’s US intelligence report on Russian hacking, calling it a politically motivated “press release” that provided no evidence that Russian actors gave the organisation hacked material.

In an online news conference, Mr Assange maintained that the report was vague and that US intelligence officials should be embarrassed by the 25-page, declassified document.

“This is a press release,” Mr Assange said. “It is clearly designed for political effects.”

The report accuses Russia of trying to interfere with the US political process, with actions that included hacking into the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and individual Democrats like Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta.

The report said Russia also used state-funded propaganda and paid “trolls” to make nasty comments on social media services.

There was no suggestion Russia manipulated the actual vote count but the agencies did not evaluate whether Moscow’s actions affected the outcome.

The report, for the first time, explicitly tied Russian President Vladimir Putin to the hackings.

It called Russian activities the “boldest effort yet” to influence a US election, and said the Russian Government provided emails to WikiLeaks, something Mr Assange denied again on Monday.

The report said Russian intelligence agencies gave stolen DNC emails to WikiLeaks, which then released them to the public.

“As we have already stated, WikiLeaks’ sources with relation to the John Podesta and DNC leaks are not state parties,” Mr Assange said.
“They do not come from the Russian Government.”

Mr Assange did not provide any clues about the source of the documents, so it was unclear whether they could have been provided to WikiLeaks from Russian proxies.

The report lacked details about how the US learned what it says it knows — such as any intercepted conversations or electronic messages from Russian leaders, including Mr Putin — or about specific hacker techniques or digital tools the US may have traced back to Russia in its investigations.

Comments
View Comments