News World Al-Qaeda still dangerous

Al-Qaeda still dangerous

Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

More than two and a half years after US commandos shot dead al-Qaeda figurehead Osama bin Laden, the global extremist network is more dangerous than ever, American experts and counterterrorism officials warn.

With a flood of recruits flowing to join al-Qaeda-linked jihadist forces fighting in Syria’s civil war, the group is back on its feet and securing territory from which it could once more threaten Europe and the US.

Bin Laden’s former lieutenants in al-Qaeda’s historic leadership have been killed by US special forces or in drone strikes, or are isolated and on the run in the tribal badlands on the Afghan-Pakistan border.

But armed groups in Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and West Africa have flocked to his banner and al-Qaeda is rebuilding its influence and recruiting fighters.

“Their leadership has been hit very hard, but this brand is still growing.

“And it’s growing from an increased number of safe havens,” retired US Marine Corps general James Mattis said.

Between 2010 and earlier this year, Mattis led US Central Command, conducting Washington’s long war against extremists in the Middle East, southwest Asia and the Horn of Africa.

He has hung up his uniform but admits the war is far from over.

“The congratulations that we heard two years ago on the demise of al-Qaeda were premature and are now discredited.”

Speaking at the Jamestown Foundation’s annual conference on terrorism in Washington this week, Mattis said, “al-Qaeda is resilient, they adapted. We have to think strategically before we act, not only act tactically.”

Bin Laden’s death in May 2011 triggered a wave of optimism that the US and its allies might have broken the back of the jihadist threat, but officials at the conference are under no illusions.

Since the audacious commando strike that took out al-Qaeda’s apparently largely symbolic chieftain, the black banner of his movement has been raised more widely than ever.

Militants inspired by or linked to bin Laden’s brand of armed jihad have sacked a US consulate in Libya and stormed a shopping mall in Kenya.

Attacks are rising again in Iraq, al-Qaeda has reportedly begun operating in Egypt’s Sinai desert and violent extremist groups are the most powerful elements in the rebel coalition fighting in the Syrian civil war.

Bruce Hoffman, the director of the Centre for Peace and Security Studies at Georgetown University, told the Jamestown conference collapsing states in the Middle East were opening up ungoverned space for extremists.

“The success of the attack in Nairobi and earlier in Mumbai suggests that these groups have now within their capacity the ability to fulfil one of bin Laden’s last commands or operational desires, which was to stage Mumbai-style attacks in Europe.”

Experts say Syria’s civil war has worked greatly to al-Qaeda’s advantage.

“The al-Qaeda affiliated groups have created an alliance which disposes of 45,000 guerrilla fighters across the country,” counterinsurgency expert David Kilcullen said.

“It’s a very significant number, almost twice as many as we see in terms of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan,” he said.

For Bruce Riedel, a three-decade CIA veteran who now works for the Brookings Institution, al-Qaeda’s resurgence is proof it has managed to ride out and ultimately profit from revolts.

“Al-Qaeda’s narrative was challenged in 2011 by the Arab Spring. Peaceful demonstrations succeeded in toppling dictators. Al-Qaeda’s narrative was at risk. Terror had not produced change, Twitter had,” Riedel said.

“But today, everything is different. Al-Qaeda’s narrative is validated in 2013, most notably in Egypt. The counter-revolution has succeeded, the army has overthrown the elected government.

“For those who want to join al-Qaeda’s movement, events in Cairo, in Damascus, have validated what they long said: Jihad is the only solution to the problem of change in the Muslim world today.”