News State New South Wales Stadium stoush is bruising NSW government’s re-election hopes
Updated:

Stadium stoush is bruising NSW government’s re-election hopes

sydney stadium rebuild sydney football stadium
A $2.2 billion rebuild of Allianz Stadium has become the hot-button issue of the NSW election. Photo: Getty
Share
Tweet Share Reddit Pin Email Comment

With just two weeks to go to the state election, a political stoush over Sydney’s Allianz Stadium has galvanised New South Wales voters.

A live-to-air, headline-grabbing threat by the new Labor leader Michael Daley to sack the Sydney Cricket Ground Trust board, including its shock- jock director Alan Jones, reignited public anger over a $2.2 billion rebuild of the eastern suburbs stadium.

Mr Daley is facing defamation action from SCG directors enraged by his imputation that they embellished the case for the demolition of the stadium.

Mr Daley, previously unknown and considered a pedestrian politician, is unrepentant and now buoyed by his prime-time higher profile for having the temerity to take on Jones on his own program on 2GB.

The current stadium’s architect, Phillip Cox, has protested at the demolition of his work, now cleared from a court injunction brought by protesters.

Mr Cox said the existing stadium was compliant with safety requirements and any modernising or updating easily could be carried out cost-effectively.

The SCG has claimed a new stadium is needed for safety reasons and invoked the Hillsborough stadium disaster in the UK as compelling justification for its replacement here.

“If the stadium is unsafe now, why did they allow sell-out crowds at the recent Michael Buble and Taylor Swift concerts?” one SCG critic told The New Daily.

One letter writer to a newspaper best summed up the anger at what many consider to be a waste of public funds, when hospitals and schools and the struggling Darling River are considered more needy.

“I’ll do without a brand new Allianz Stadium. I’ll put up with the old one and the Premier can use the $2.2 billion to help the [Darling] river”.

nsw parliament gladys berejiklian
Premier Gladys Berejiklian has been thrust into the defensive over her decision to rebuild Allianz. Photo: AAP

The Gladys Berejiklian Liberal-National government in NSW is now in grave danger at the state election on March 23. Even with full employment, a rude $3.9 billion state budget surplus and with the pressure off housing affordability because of the Sydney property price slump, the Allianz dispute – plus collateral federal LNP brand damage – has put the NSW Coalition government’s third term in jeopardy.

The latest Newspoll shows there is a 4.3 per cent swing currently running against the NSW Coalition. More statewide polling is imminent and is expected to cover the media frenzy over Allianz stadium.

A 4.3 per cent swing to Labor is not sufficient to defeat the government outright. But if such a swing is uniform across electorates on March 23, NSW electors will return a hung parliament.

Then it is a question of which party has the most ‘bearpit’ (lower house) numbers and can wrangle a show of support on confidence motions from returning crossbench MPs to persuade NSW Governor His Excellency David Hurley, to commission that party’s leader to form executive government.

The current state of the parties is: Liberals 36; Nationals 16; ALP 34; Greens 3; Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 1; independents 3. A party leader needs to show His Excellency the signature support of 47 MPs to win a commission.

Mr Daley replaced Luke Foley as state Labor leader last November after Mr Foley resigned following a groping scandal. Mr Daley has to pick up 13 seats to win majority government. On the electoral pendulum, that task would require a swing of around 9 per cent – not impossible if voter baseball bats are out.

But where the Berejiklian government is most vulnerable is in National Party-held seats. Mr Daley told The New Daily that he was hoping to get to government by majority outright, or in minority with crossbench support, through the collapse of the National Party vote in the bush.

NSW election
NSW Nationals leader John Barilaro has reportedly dumped any Nationals branding from his election material. Photo: Facebook

Is this feasible or is he suffering from candidate’s syndrome? In Monaro (margin 2.5 per cent) southern NSW state Nationals leader John Barilaro is up against Labor’s Bryce Wilson.

Significantly, Mr Barilaro is reported to have dropped all National Party brand signage from his marketing and is emphasising his strength as the local member to hold on to his seat.

If the Nationals vote collapses across the state there is a greater prospect of rural independents and a resurgent Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party being elected than a direct benefit to Labor.

NSW has optional preferential which, according to ABC psephologist Antony Green, tends to complicate outcomes, particularly with Pauline Hanson’s One Nation now a registered political party in NSW.

One Nation is standing candidates to compete directly against the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party for any vulnerable National Party seat. One Nation’s leader in NSW is former federal Labor leader Mark Latham, now considered a certainty to be elected to the state’s upper house.

Premier Berejiklian, although a competent technocrat, appears to be struggling to articulate a strong re-election narrative and has been placed on the defensive over her decision to demolish Allianz Stadium; another year’s delay in the completion of a disruptive tramway system through the Sydney CBD; continuing anger over the massive Westconnex toll road compulsory acquisitions; and perceived over-development by high- density apartment blocks through once-leafy areas of greater Sydney.

Cracks through the load-bearing structural walls of a high rise apartment block co-developed by the government, have not helped the government’s standing.

Quentin Dempster is a Walkley Award-winning journalist, author and broadcaster. He is a veteran of the ABC newsroom. He was awarded an Order of Australia in 1992 for services to journalism.

Comments
View Comments