Advertisement

Minister faces court action over climate harms

Great Barrier Reef given 'not in danger' status

The federal Environment Minister is being taken to court, accused of failing to protect the Great Barrier Reef and Australia’s other living treasures from climate harms caused by coal mining.

The Federal Court will hear the case against Tanya Plibersek in Melbourne this week and those behind it say the outcome could have implications for major coal and gas projects across Australia.

The Environment Council of Central Queensland is pursuing Plibersek after she refused its request to reconsider the full scope of climate impacts from two coal mining projects at Narrabri and in the Hunter Valley in NSW.

The companies behind the projects – Whitehaven Coal subsidiary Narrabri Coal Operations, and MACH Energy – have joined the proceedings in support of the minister.

Lawyers from Environmental Justice Australia are representing the council and will argue federal environment laws generally require the assessment of climate impacts, caused by fossil fuels, on 2100 matters of national environmental significance.

They range from entire ecosystems such as the reef and the Tasmanian wilderness to individual species including the critically endangered Baw Baw frog and the blue-top sun-orchid, which is down to 130 plants.

“Our client argues it was unlawful for Australia’s environment minister to refuse to act on the climate science, outlined in thousands of scientific reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and her own department,” EJA senior lawyer Retta Berryman said.

“Our client asserts the minister has a legal responsibility to face up to the harm new coal and gas will cause to Australia’s unique plants, animals and places.”

Christine Carlisle is president of the Environment Centre of Central Queensland. She said she was relieved the issue was now in the hands of a court.

“We hope not just to win these cases, but to set a precedent that all new coal and gas projects must be properly assessed for their climate risk to our environment.

“We didn’t want it to come to this … We’re doing this because we’re so tired of the sound bites. So tired of photos of ministers posing with koalas, saying all the right things but failing to act.”

The case is centred on Whitehaven’s plan to extend underground mining at the Narrabri thermal coal mine until 2044, and MACH Energy’s intention to expand open-cut thermal coal mining at Mount Pleasant in the Hunter Valley until almost 2050.

Climate Council research director Simon Bradshaw said it was reckless for the government to approve new coal mines without considering the climate harm that came from burning those fossil fuels.

“These two coal mines’ lifetime emissions total 1.35 billion tonnes of carbon pollution, that’s roughly triple Australia’s total emissions last year, and that will contribute to the warming of our planet,” he said.

“Any missed opportunity to leave coal and gas in the ground increases the danger we will face, and is condemning future Australians to greater hardships.”

Plibersek declined to comment due to the looming proceedings, as did Whitehaven Coal. MACH Energy was also contacted but did not respond.

– AAP

Stay informed, daily
A FREE subscription to The New Daily arrives every morning and evening.
The New Daily is a trusted source of national news and information and is provided free for all Australians. Read our editorial charter
Copyright © 2024 The New Daily.
All rights reserved.