News National Labor calls on crossbench to oppose parental leave changes
Updated:

Labor calls on crossbench to oppose parental leave changes

Parental leave is important because it fosters good relations between employers and employee
Parental leave is important because it fosters good relations between employers and employee.
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Thousands of pregnant mothers will lose money under a government crackdown on paid parental leave (PPL) that could start as early as January.

But Labor says it will never vote to tighten access to parental leave payments and is hopeful Senate crossbenchers will all oppose the move.

Laws to tighten access to the paid leave scheme, set up by the previous Labor government, are before parliament and could start as soon as January, meaning women who are pregnant now could miss out on benefits.

It’s estimated 80,000 women each year will be worse off under the changes, which reduce the 18 weeks of leave paid for by the government if a new parent’s employer already offers paid leave. 

CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA - DECEMBER 04: Opposition leader Bill Shorten and his colleagues speak to the media during a press conference to reflect on 'Tony Abbott's Year of Broken Promises' at Parliament House on December 4, 2014 in Canberra, Australia. Today is the official last day of sitting at Parliament for 2014. Parliament will return on February 9, 2015. (Photo by Stefan Postles/Getty Images)
Bill Shorten and opposition families spokeswoman Jenny Macklin (L) will look for crossbench support to oppose changes to paid parental leave: Photo Getty

“This is a direct attack on paid parental leave, a direct attack on those mothers who are trying to combine their work and family responsibilities and will leave thousands and thousands of new mothers in this country worse off,” opposition families spokeswoman Jenny Macklin told reporters in Melbourne on Sunday.

She said there were between 40,000 and 50,000 women already pregnant who would be left up to $12,000 worse off.

Social Services Minister Christian Porter said more than half the parents who used the scheme – numbering about 90,000 – would not be affected by the changes.

“Currently a parent earning $140,000 annually can receive a combined government and employer PPL amount of more than $44,000 – this is more than another parent working a minimum wage will earn in an entire year and that is not fair,” he told AAP in a statement.

Labor says the vast majority of women affected were on low incomes.

“Why should nurses, or shop assistants or other people who have foregone pay rises in lieu of getting a paid parental benefit now be slugged because they’ve negotiated these conditions and not get the minimum paid parental leave?” Opposition Leader Bill Shorten told reporters in Burnie.

Ms Macklin said she hoped Senate crossbenchers would join Labor in opposing the bill.

“In the past, the crossbench have understood just how important it is for women to have time at home with their newborn baby,” she said.

-AAP

Comments
View Comments