News National Workers’ compensation changes slammed
Updated:

Workers’ compensation changes slammed

Workers
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

The Federal Government’s proposed overhaul of the workers’ compensation scheme has been slammed, with a review warning it fails the public interest test, and workers, small and medium businesses and taxpayers will suffer.

The report recommends the changes should be rejected, describing them as “a retrograde step that adopts a lowest common denominator approach to workers’ compensation”.

The McKell Institute report, Designing a Best Practice National Workers’ Compensation Scheme, was commissioned by the Electrical Trades Union to examine the impacts of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014, which will be debated in the Senate this week.

Two-for-one: ‘if Baird goes, so will Abbott’
Abbott ‘has what it takes’ to win next election
Former PM Malcolm Fraser dead at 84 

Author of the review, Joanna Howe, a senior lecturer of law at the University of Adelaide, found the bill to disadvantage the majority of employers and workers, but big business was the winner.

“For workers, this plan would result in a national scheme that provides the least entitlements, has the least effective regulator, and the lengthiest dispute resolution process of all the workers’ compensation jurisdictions in Australia,” Dr Howe says.

Safety, Rehabilitation Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014
Employment and Workplace Relations Shadow Minister Brendan O’Connor opposes the amendment bill. Photo: AAP

“The vast majority of businesses would also be disadvantaged as only multi-state employers can move to the national scheme, reducing the premium pool of the state and territory schemes and resulting in increases premiums for the small- and medium-sized businesses that remain.

“It also shifts the cost of workers’ compensation claims from employers to the public purse as common law access is limited, increasing the cost burden faced by the NDIS, Medicare and welfare systems arising from work-related injuries.”

Employment Minister Eric Abetz was contacted for comment on Sunday by The New Daily, however he is yet to respond.

The government is pushing its changes as a logical development to allow businesses to operate in multiple states and territories without having to navigate complex compensation schemes in those states and territories.

There are 30 large companies allowed to self-insure for workers’ compensation under national laws – including Telstra, Optus, National Australia Bank and Australia Post.

The bill, if passed, will throw open the doors for another estimated 2000 companies to self-insure and leave state schemes.

Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI), manager, workplace health, safety and compensation, Carolyn Davis, says the ACCI supports the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014.

“We believe it gives businesses an opportunity to make a commercial decision to participate in the commonwealth scheme, allowing them to weigh up the costs and the benefits,” ms Davis says.

“The vast majority of businesses in Australia operate within a single jurisdiction, so are not directly impacted.

“The bill does not provide a solution for all multi-state employers as the costs of self-insurance may outweigh the benefits. Businesses should be allowed to make this decision themselves.”

The McKell Institute report warned that under the proposed scheme, Comcare could potentially be responsible for 67 times its current workload capacity.

Dr Howe said the human and economic impact of workplace injury was impossible to ignore, and highlighted the importance of a well-designed workers’ compensation system.

“Last year 184 lives were lost at work,” she said.

Education Minister Christopher Pyne, who introduced the bill in Parliament, said Labor had closed entry into the national scheme in 2007 as a result of pressure from union leaders, Fairfax reports.

 Safety, Rehabilitation Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014
Christopher Pyne said Labor had closed entry into the national scheme in 2007 as a result of pressure from union leaders. Photo: AAP

But Employment and Workplace Relations Shadow Minster Brendan O’Connor spoke in parliament on November 24, 2014, saying he opposed the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014.

“This bill, if enacted, will directly and indirectly risk the workplace health and safety of Australian workers. It will also remove the rights of Australian workers to fair and reasonable cover when they suffer the misfortune of a work-related illness or injury,” Mr O’Connor said.

“As a consequence of the proposed legislation there will be workers – who want nothing more than to earn a dignified living – who will in future bear the full brunt of work injuries for life without any assistance from a workers’ compensation scheme.”

The report made several recommendations for the Federal Government, saying it should pursue a bipartisan, fact-driven approach to creating a nationally consistent workers’ compensation framework.

The Business Council of Australia and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry have been approached for comment.

Click the Advisor owl to see the recommendations.  

Comments
View Comments