News Election 2016 ALP Medicare claims are a beat-up: Shepherd
Updated:

ALP Medicare claims are a beat-up: Shepherd

Tony Shepherd has blasted Labor's Medicare claims.
AAP
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Opposition’s claims that the Government plans to privatise Medicare are a “gross misrepresentation”, according to the businessman who chaired the Coalition’s 2013 Commission of Audit.

The claims of a Labor overreach have also been backed by Australia’s peak doctors’ body, the Australian Medical Association.

Labor has continued to accuse the Government of having a secret plan to privatise Medicare’s payments system, forcing Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to emphatically rule out any outsourcing of Medicare’s functions.

• Heinz accused by ACCC of ‘misleading’ parents
• Tigers to boycott Eddie’s Triple M over Wilson
• Greens gunning for Feeney

In his 2013 report, Tony Shepherd recommended that the Government outsource its whole system of payments, including Medicare’s.

Mr Shepherd told Lateline that outsourcing the upgrade of the “clunky”, 25-year-old system is not privatisation.

“I think that is a gross misrepresentation. I think that is really stretching it, I mean governments outsource a lot of their operations in that back office space already. It’s not privatisation,” he said.

The Labor leader went hard on Medicare at Sunday's launch. Photo: AAP.
The Labor leader went hard on Medicare at Sunday’s launch. Photo: AAP.

“Outsourcing operations of government with the government retaining 100 per cent control is not privatisation, that’s just a bit more efficient method of delivery.”

Mr Shepherd said the payments system desperately needed an upgrade.

“It is about 25 years old and it’s a legacy system. It can’t cope much longer with making $450 million worth of payments everyday of the year,” he said.

“It has to be rebuilt. There is no doubt about that.”

He told Lateline consumers would suffer if the system was not rebuilt.

“Who suffers in this is actually the consumer because the system is old and clunky and takes time and makes mistakes because we get a bit of fraud on the side as well,” he said.

Mr Shepherd also said it was disappointing that the Government was not pursuing the introduction of a Medicare co-payment.

“The bottom line is our budget is out of control. With an aging population, incredibly increasing aged costs, health costs, aged care costs, aged pension costs, NDIS, we cannot afford everything we’ve got on the table,” he said.

“We’re in deficit as a result of that and we’re borrowing money now to meet these new payments, leaving a debt to our children and grandchildren. Grossly unfair. So we have to do something.

“I think a modest co-payment for people who can afford it, I think is a sensible thing.”

AMA president Michael Gannon criticises Shorten’s campaign

The new head of the Australian Medical Association has dealt a blow to Opposition Leader Bill Shorten’s claim the Government wants to privatise Medicare.

Mr Shorten’s assertion is based on the fact the Government is considering outsourcing what Dr Michael Gannon has dubbed Medicare’s “antiquated” and “rusty” payments system.

He said privatising the payments system “in no way” amounted to privatising Medicare, as Mr Shorten has claimed.

“I’ve never seen, and nor do I see, a proposal to potentially privatise the payments system as … a way to privatise Medicare,” Dr Gannon said.

“The evidence just doesn’t stack up.

“We also understand how important Medicare is to voters and that’s why it’s such a potent claim from the Labor Party but the AMA will always call governments to account, they will call oppositions to account.”

Dr Gannon added he was pleased with “numerous” elements of Labor’s health policy.

“Most noticeably unravelling the freeze on patient rebates,” he said.

Dr Gannon — the head of obstetrics and gynaecology at St John of God Subiaco Hospital in Perth —took over the reins of the AMA in May from Sydney neurosurgeon Brian Owler.

Dr Gannon said he would respond to policies from both sides of politics on merit.

“The AMA should look at things issue by issue, focus on the health,” he said.

“I’m not interested in partisanship, I’m interested in the policy.”

Comments
View Comments