Advertisement

How Victoria’s face masks order became instantly politicised

It took America in the presidency of Donald Trump a little while to start its full-on assault on face masks.

In Australia, it was instant.

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews’ mandatory mask order for Melburnians has been pilloried in newspapers and social media by right-wing culture warriors.

coronavirus

Masks will be mandatory in Melbourne from Thursday. Photo: AAP

The politicisation of the face mask directive was swift, with politicians, commentators and online numpties not even waiting until Mr Andrews and Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton had finished their announcement before laying the boot in.

In a move straight from the Trump playbook, detailed expert advice on a health issue was politicised, put aside, mocked or downright ignored.

State opposition leader Michael O’Brien tweeted his confusion that masks were once deemed unnecessary, but now compulsory.

The fast-moving nature of this virus – whereby Victoria went from the poster child of the Australian response, to record-breaking cases – might have something to do with the fast-changing advice.

News Corp’s Andrew Bolt went further.

In a column published on the Herald Sun’s website just hours after Mr Andrews’ announcement, he asked: “On what medical basis is this necessary?”

The medical basis was “the latest advice from the chief health officer”, Mr Andrews said, in literally the second line of the public statement announcing the mask order on Sunday.

“By covering my face, I’m helping to keep you safe – and by covering your face, you’re helping to keep every Victorian safe,” Professor Sutton said.

coronavirus

Melburnians have until midnight on Wednesday to get masks. Photo: AAP

Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt said he agreed with the order.

The Herald Sun shared Bolt’s column on social media with a tweet claiming the order was “not backed up by the science, and looks like more empty actions from a man who likes to look busy”.

It’s unclear what “the science” Bolt referred to shows, but the World Health Organisation says masks “should be used as part of a comprehensive strategy of measures to suppress transmission and save lives”, combined with hygiene and distancing measures; and that “medical masks can protect people wearing the mask from getting infected, as well as can prevent those who have symptoms from spreading them”.

 

Respected immunologist Professor Peter Doherty also jumped in.

A study published in The Lancet medical journal in June found “face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection”.

On the other end of the political spectrum, federal Labor MP Andrew Giles was one of the first elected members to support the mask order.

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd slammed the News Corp papers’ coverage, including one prominent headline above a picture of a mask-wearing Mr Andrews that suggested “COVID cover-up: Masks the new reality”.

 

Of course, the anti-mask politics didn’t stop with politicians and political commentators.

Former TV chef Pete Evans shared a post on Facebook of “free legal advice” that “was sent to me”, telling fans “Don’t wear a mask”.

Byron Bay musician Ziggy Alberts shared a series of Instagram Stories on the mask order, telling fans “all it does is strips Australians of their basic rights in what is supposed to be a free society”.

Most prominently, former UFC fighter Vik Grujic started an online firestorm with his tweet to Mr Andrews stating that “I will not comply. I will not bow down to you”.

“I’m a proud Australian. Born free,” Grujic tweeted, borrowing rhetoric from the United States by linking wearing masks with an erosion of personal freedoms.

“No dictator” he added in response to Mr Andrews’ order, later linking the Premier to “Marxists” – more talk taken from American conversations.

Talk of masks infringing freedoms, or being linked to ‘communism’, has been a common argument in the US, as conspiracy theorists share claims that the pandemic is overblown.

Masks have been a hot-button issue, proving a flashpoint for arguments and physical fights as people are refused entry to stores or public places for not covering their face.

Of course, not everyone thinks it’s a freedom issue.

Stay informed, daily
A FREE subscription to The New Daily arrives every morning and evening.
The New Daily is a trusted source of national news and information and is provided free for all Australians. Read our editorial charter
Copyright © 2024 The New Daily.
All rights reserved.