Life Science Environment Forests ’emit more CO2 than they soak up’

Forests ’emit more CO2 than they soak up’

carbon forests
A report suggests forests in areas such as the Blue Mountains may emit more CO2 than they absorb. Photo: Getty
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Sites containing some of the world’s most treasured forests, including the Yosemite National Park and Indonesia’s Sumatra rainforest, have been emitting more heat-trapping carbon dioxide than they have absorbed in recent years, a UN-backed report says.

According to the report released on Thursday, factors such as logging, wildfires and clearance of land for agriculture are to blame.

The excess carbon dioxide turns up from just 10 of 257 forests classified among UNESCO World Heritage sites.

The Switzerland-based International Union for Conservation of Nature and UNESCO, the UN’s cultural and educational agency, said their report provides the first-ever assessment of greenhouse gases produced and absorbed in UNESCO-listed forests.

The study was based on information collected through on-site monitoring and from satellites.

The study adds to growing signs that human activities and the fall-out from climate change – which scientists say has made weather extremes like drought and wildfires more likely – have transformed some natural carbon dioxide sinks that suck up CO2 from the air into net sources of it over the last two decades.

“All forests should be assets in the fight against climate change,” said Tales Carvalho Resende, a co-author of the report who works at Paris-based UNESCO.

“Our report’s finding that even some of the most iconic and best protected forests, such as those found in World Heritage sites, can actually contribute to climate change is alarming.”

The consequences of climate change will be on many minds as world leaders gather in Glasgow starting this weekend for a key United Nations climate conference known as COP26.

The 10 sites that were net sources of carbon dioxide from 2001 to 2020 were the tropical rainforest in Sumatra; the Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve in Honduras; Grand Canyon National Park and Yosemite National Park in the US; Waterton Glacier International Peace Park in Canada and the US; the Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains in South Africa; Kinabalu Park in Malaysia; the Uvs Nuur Basin in Russia and Mongolia; the Greater Blue Mountains area of Australia; and Morne Trois Pitons National Park in Dominica.

All told, however, the net emissions from the 10 sites together amount to little compared to the total of roughly 190 million tonnes of carbon dioxide that are absorbed each year by all 257 UNESCO-listed forests.

Of those, about 80 sites were net neutral, while the rest were net absorbers of carbon dioxide.

The 10 sites accounted for nearly 5.5 million tons of net emissions.

The most impactful was the Tropical Rainforest in Sumatra, which removed about 1.2 million tonnes from the atmosphere but released another 4.2 million – making for net emissions of about 3 million tonnes.

That was from a combination of logging and wood harvesting, as well as the impact of agriculture, the study found.


Promoted Stories