The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia has gone into bat for the importance of super, rejecting claims that non-super assets will provide significant support for most people in retirement.
ASFA chief Martin Fahy told the a Senate economics legislation committee looking at the objectives of super that super is the “main game in town” and rejected claims other financial assets “could do the heavy lifting” Independent Financial Adviser has reported.
“Only one in five households has an investment property and only one in 30 households has an interest in a public or private trust.
“Analysis of wealth distribution using mean or average data instead of an approach based on the median or typical Australian is breathtaking in its lack of analytical rigour.”
Dr Fahy said recent ABS figures show that for households with the household head aged 15 to 64, superannuation is the most commonly held asset, apart from own home, bank accounts and motor vehicles.
For the great bulk of households – 90 per cent or more – superannuation, together with owner-occupied housing, were the dominant forms of saving to support living standards in retirement, he said.
“Another key fact under attack by some commentators is that super already makes a substantive difference to the retirement incomes of low-income earners,” he said.
“Even low balances under the assets test threshold can lead to significant increases in income. The suggestion that super doesn’t assist low-income earners is a nonsense,” he said.
“ASFA projections show those reaching the comfortable standard will increase from about 20 to 40 per cent of Australians by 2040, based on current settings and including the increase in Superannuation Guarantee payments to 12 per cent.
“Super is working to provide more and more Australians with a dignified retirement as the system matures. We shouldn’t sell out future generations of retirees by swapping our aspirations for superannuation for short-term fiscal imperatives,” Dr Fahy said.