Finance Your Super Government tables contentious changes to super choice
Updated:

Government tables contentious changes to super choice

AAP
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Not-for-profit super funds have accused the federal government of caving into banks saying new draft legislation put commercial gains ahead of what was right for the sector and its members.

“The ‘for-profit’ bank-owned funds, with their chronic underperformance, have lobbied the government to design a disclosure regime that places their commercial interests ahead of the public interest,” Industry Super Australia chief executive, David Whiteley, said.

“After a fortnight of scandals involving banks, it is astonishing the government would introduce a bill that again suits the banks and their super funds. Their spurious claims about compliance costs have yet again prevailed over sensible policy settings.”

Assistant Treasurer Kelly O’Dwyer introduced two bills to Parliament, saying up to 800,000 employees who currently do not have choice of fund under enterprise agreements and workplace determinations would benefit if the choice legislation was passed.

• Govt missing infrastructure boat: IFM Investors
• No super changes are likely before May budget
• ‘Super not for wealth creation’: Kelly O’Dwyer

Separately, she said the Transparency Measures Bill fulfilled the government’s election commitment to enhance the quality of information available to fund members and employers so they could make informed decisions when comparing the performance of funds.

But ISA immediately slammed both pieces of proposed legislation, saying the government’s decision to exempt banks from disclosing their charges and returns on some super products meant consumers would not be able to make informed choices.

The ISA says workers will be less informed on their super choices. Photo:Getty
The ISA says workers will be less informed on their super choices. Photo:Getty

Mr Whiteley said there would be next to no benefit for consumers in the new ‘transparency’ measures, adding: “Instead, banks and their ‘for-profit’ super funds will continue to bury facts about fees and investment returns for too many of their investment options.”

Moves to broaden super choice

In introducing the legislation, Ms O’Dwyer said currently around two million employees did not have the opportunity to choose the fund into which their compulsory employer contributions were paid.

“A common way this can occur is through enterprise bargaining agreements and workplace determinations, which may mandate a given super fund,” she said.

“The Turnbull government recognises it doesn’t make sense to force employees to save money in superannuation but then leave key decisions about how it is managed outside their control.

“The Choice of Fund Bill is designed to let people take control of their superannuation to improve retirement outcomes.”

She said the change also meant people with multiple jobs who may currently be forced to maintain more than one super account would be able to consolidate their retirement savings to ensure their savings were not eroded by multiple sets of fees and insurance premiums.

Transparency measures not so clear

Meanwhile, Ms O’Dwyer said the transparency bill changes would result in super funds being required to develop choice product dashboards for their top 10 largest choice investment options, by value.

The big banks have been lobbying for disclosure exemptions on some products.Photo: AAP
The big banks have been lobbying for disclosure exemptions on some products. Photo: AAP

Super funds would be made to disclose investments made directly and through associated entities, but not through non-associated entities.

But Mr Whiteley said new laws only requiring funds to produce a public dashboard for their top 10 products denied consumers simple, accessible information on thousands of investment options.

“Incongruously, the government is also seeking to remove Howard-era choice of fund exemptions, while not requiring super funds to provide consumers with the information they need to make an informed decision,” he said.

The legislation will not pass the Senate before the May budget.

top-stories-sugar

Comments
View Comments