Entertainment TV Indigenous NT community slaps Sunrise with defamation suit

Indigenous NT community slaps Sunrise with defamation suit

Sunrise segment
Prue MacSween, Samantha Armytage and Ben Davis on the controversial March 13 Sunrise segment. Photo: Twitter
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

Residents of a remote Northern Territory community have launched defamation action against Channel Seven over a controversial segment on its Sunrise breakfast program.

In March last year Sunrise broadcast a segment about non-Indigenous families caring for Aboriginal children who have been exposed to abuse, which was later found to have breached the commercial television industry code of practise.

Lawyer Peter O’Brien said Sunrise illustrated the story with footage of residents in Yirrkala, an Aboriginal community of about 850 people 1000 kilometres east of Darwin.

Even though a blurring filter was used, he said adults and children were still able to be seen and identified.

He said the footage was originally shot with the residents’ permission as part of a story about a positive health initiative, and was disturbed to now see it played in such a negative context.

“Simply picking up this footage and playing it behind that sort of context, particularly with the very sorry message that’s being pushed in this particular program, is very disturbing,” Mr O’Brien said.

“They were able to identify themselves and have had others identify them.

“So we say that there are clearly defamatory imputations that flow from the content and footage depicted behind the content, in the context of the program itself.”

In a statement, Mr O’Brien’s law firm said it will be argued in the Federal Court that the context of the commentary resulted in defamatory imputations that the people featured in the footage had abused, assaulted or neglected children, were incapable of protecting their children, were members of a dysfunctional community and were people who participated in a harmful culture.

Channel Seven pointed out that the footage was blurred.

“The proceedings relate to some footage used in the background to the story which was blurred to prevent any person being identified and Seven is able to defend the case on that basis,” a Seven spokesman said.

“We can’t comment further as the matter is before the court.”

The case was heard in Federal Court in Sydney on Friday, and will resume on June 12.