Entertainment Celebrity Royal Judge partly dismisses Meghan Markle’s privacy lawsuit
Updated:

Judge partly dismisses Meghan Markle’s privacy lawsuit

Meghan Markle tabloid court
Meghan Markle is fighting in court to keep the names of the five friends secret. Photo: Getty
Share
Twitter Facebook Reddit Pinterest Email

The Duchess of Sussex has lost an early round in a London court when a judge dismissed part of her lawsuit against the publisher of a British newspaper that put out excerpts of a letter to her estranged father.

Meghan sued Associated Newspapers for invasion of privacy and copyright infringement last year over a series of articles in the Mail on Sunday that reproduced parts of the letter she wrote in August 2018, several months after the former US actress known as Meghan Markle married Britain’s Prince Harry.

In a ruling on Friday, Judge Mark Warby threw out some of the causes of action argued in her lawsuit, including the claim that the newspaper publisher acted “dishonestly” by quoting only certain passages of her letter.

Judge Warby also struck out the claim that Associated Newspapers deliberately “stirred up” a dispute between Meghan and her father, Thomas Markle, and had an agenda to publish intrusive or offensive stories about her.

The judge said the allegations should not be part of the case as it proceeds because he found them irrelevant to establishing if the publisher was guilty of the illegal acts cited in the duchess’ lawsuit: misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act.

However, Judge Warby said the dismissed claims could be revived at a later stage of the case.

Associated Newspapers denies the allegations.

Meghan has previously said that if she won the case, she would donate any damages she might be awarded an anti-bullying charity.

Her lawyers argue that the hand-written letter in question was a “private and intimate” message from a daughter to her father, and accuse the newspaper of targeting Meghan with “distortive, manipulative, and dishonest tactics”.

“The duchess’ rights were violated; the legal boundaries around privacy were crossed,” her lawyers said in a statement on Friday.

They expressed surprise that the judge’s ruling “suggests that dishonest behaviour is not relevant,” but added that “the core elements of this case do not change and will continue to move forward”.