The New Daily

This could be the most plausible MH370 theory yet

Dangerous exploding cargo might have brought down plane, theory suggests.

MH370 flaperon

A flaperon part from the plane was uncovered in July.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 could have been brought down by the ignition of volatile cargo, a credible new theory suggests.

US Federal Aviation officials called for a ban on the transportation of rechargeable lithium ion batteries earlier this month, due to an “immediate and urgent” risk they could catch fire or explode during flight.

It prompted a resurgence in theories of what caused flight MH370 to vanish on March 8, 2014. As it turns out, the ill-fated flight was carrying 221kg of the batteries in its cargo hold.

• MH370 wreckage linked with…Philippines jungle
• MH370 debris search stopped
• The terrifying final moments of flight MH17

According to one report, the theory that the plane could have been brought down by its cargo was “compelling”.

An aviation expert told The New Daily it was certainly the most credible theory put forward so far.

UPS plane fire, 2006

A UPS plane landed in Philadelphia in 2006 after the crew noticed smoke coming from the cargo hold. Batteries were examined as a possible cause. Photo: AAP

“Fire would damage some of the safety equipment, or some of the equipment could have been turned off or disabled – that would explain the transponders being turned off,” CQ University senior lecturer Ron Bishop said.

“If you look at their flight path they did almost a complete 180 [degree turn] back towards Malaysia, and if you have a problem in-flight that is essentially what you would do.

“I’m not sure what happened with the last turn towards the right, that could have been because of a lack of oxygen.

“You just don’t know – that is the most frustrating thing, we just don’t know.”

Air transport of lithium ion batteries is strictly regulated.

The high levels of electrical energy and flammable chemicals they contain can be a volatile mix if short-circuited.

A 2014 flight from Melbourne to Fiji nearly demonstrated this, when a lithium ion battery ignited in the cargo hold moments before passengers boarded the plane.

As for the MH370’s divergent path, Mr Bishop’s theory is that a loss of oxygen, called hypoxia, could be the reason.

“What happens when you lose oxygen is you don’t know you need oxygen – it pretty much just hits you,” he said.

See the video below for an explanation of hypoxia:

Mystery rich with conspiracies

Hypothetical explanations abounded after the MH370’s strange disappearance, ranging from loosely plausible to outright absurd.

Predictably, rumours of North Korean involvement surfaced pretty quickly.

aliens

No mysterious disappearance could go without attracting theories of alien involvement. The MH370 is no different. Although so far, no evidence has been found to support these theories. Photo: Shutterstock

Some thought the rogue nation was responsible for bringing down the plane, while one unnamed aviation staffer told eTurboNews “somebody [in North Korea] wants a really, really huge plane” – “most likely” with the Boeing 777’s technology.

But if North Korea wasn’t responsible, other theories pinned the blame on Russian president Vladmir Putin.

The Russian strongman ordered the plane be diverted to an airstrip in Kazakhstan, science journalist and author Jeff Wise proposed earlier this year.

Yet another – and surely the most absurd – was extrapolated from the plane’s factory number.

The Boeing 777 aircraft that disappeared was the 404th of its kind to be manufactured, leading some to pick up on the ominous coincidence with the ‘404 – page not found’ message displayed in place of a broken web link.

Mr Bishop said although some theories were entirely far-fetched, others had merit, but the discovery of the plane’s flaperon on the shore of Reunion Island earlier this year had changed that.

“Really none of them are really far out … because there is so much we don’t know. They all are fairly plausible at this point and they all have holes in them,” he said.

“My two theories, of the batteries or the decrease in oxygen, or both … still has quite a few holes in it as well.”

SEVEN ELEVEN STOCK

  • Sandy

    no wrong plane. This is MH370, the one Julie Bishop is talking about is MH17 which was shot down (ie no doubt about that).

  • Andy

    Wrong Malaysian Airlines flight Colin. Julie is seeking justice for MH17 – the one shot down over the Ukraine, not MH370 discussed in this article.
    As for the theory espoused herein – it’s completely ludicrous – which is what you get when you seek a quote from a “senior” lecturer at a 3rd rate university. While a Lithium Battery fire has a remote chance to have caused some of the problems claimed, it is clear from the flight path that the pilot deliberately avoided radar coverage, and while he did turn back towards Malaysia, he didn’t turn back towards an airport. Also the theory fails to explain the complete lack of radio transmissions from the plane which the fire wouldn’t have disabled. A plane with a fire so serious as to be able do disable the transponders and other equipment would have destroyed the plane well before it crashed into the mid-Indian Ocean, where current analysis and the physical wreckage discovered on Reunion Island demonstrates it crashed.
    New Daily – Trashy Tabloid Journalism at it’s best

  • Rye an

    Just get Jesse Ventura on to it, or one of Faux News contributors……simple realy.

  • Brendan Kelly

    So what happened to the Jindalee over the horizon radar not working that night

  • Jean Vincent

    So how does this new “credible” theory explain that the plane flew another 8 hours after the explosion?

    This is just a click bait.

  • rob

    I didn’t think this was a “new” theory. It was one of the first that I’d heard bandied about; particularly as it was supposedly and illegal cargo lift due to the volume. Another great conspiracy theory I heard was related to a “Lost”-type scenario where the plane was hijacked and landed on Diego Garcia. Look it up.

  • junaid

    MY DEAR FRIENDS, I AM LAYMAN WHEN ITS COMES TO AVIATION. I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THE CRASH THEORIES VERY CLOSELY AND FROM DAY ONE. ON ONE COUNT ALL THESE EXPERTS SAY THAT THE PILOT HAD SWITCHED OFF ALL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS TO AVOID RADAR DETECTION AND ON ANOTHER COUNT THEY SAY THE PLANE FLEW 8 TIMES OVER THAILAND AND MALAYSIA, CAN THEY GIVE THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON WHO WAS DETECTING THE PLANE SO CLOSELY. THEN THE NEXT THEORY IS THAT AFTER THE 8 TRIPS THE PLANE FLEW FOR 7 HRS. ALL THIS IS BECOMING TOOOOO MUCH TO DIGEST. THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY OTHER INCIDENTS / ACCIDENTS WHICH HAVE STILL NOT BEEN SOLVED. BUT LET ME TELL YOU IT INTRIGUES ME MORE AND THE FACT THAT SOME OF THE PEOPLE HAVE MORE INSIGHT THAN THESE SO CALLED EXPERTS OF AVIATION

  • Maako

    It wasn’t a child saying “look daddy a plan “, lots of people including old, young, adults have seen a plan from kudahuvadhoo…..

Try us on tablet & mobile